Genon, S., Eickhoff, S. B. & Kharabian, S. Linking interindividual variability in mind construction to behavior. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 307–318 (2022).
Google Scholar
Sui, J., Jiang, R., Bustillo, J. & Calhoun, V. Neuroimaging-based individualized prediction of cognition and habits for psychological issues and well being: strategies and guarantees. Biol. Psychiatry 88, 818–828 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gabrieli, J. D. E., Ghosh, S. S. & Whitfield-Gabrieli, S. Prediction as a humanitarian and pragmatic contribution from human cognitive neuroscience. Neuron 85, 11–26 (2015).
Google Scholar
Scheinost, D. et al. Ten easy guidelines for predictive modeling of particular person variations in neuroimaging. Neuroimage 193, 35–45 (2019).
Google Scholar
Poldrack, R. A., Huckins, G. & Varoquaux, G. Institution of finest practices for proof for prediction: a evaluate. JAMA Psychiatry 77, 534–540 (2020).
Google Scholar
Goltermann, J. et al. Cross-validation for the estimation of impact measurement generalizability in mass-univariate brain-wide affiliation research. Preprint at bioRxiv (2023).
Spisak, T., Bingel, U. & Wager, T. D. Multivariate BWAS will be replicable with reasonable pattern sizes. Nature 615, E4–E7 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yarkoni, T. & Westfall, J. Selecting prediction over rationalization in psychology: classes from machine studying. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 12, 1100–1122 (2017).
Google Scholar
Williams, L. M. & Whitfield Gabrieli, S. Neuroimaging for precision medication in psychiatry. Neuropsychopharmacology 50, 246–257 (2024).
Google Scholar
Woo, C.-W., Chang, L. J., Lindquist, M. A. & Wager, T. D. Constructing higher biomarkers: mind fashions in translational neuroimaging. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 365–377 (2017).
Google Scholar
Greene, A. S. & Constable, R. T. Medical promise of brain-phenotype modeling: a evaluate. JAMA Psychiatry 80, 848 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cui, Z. & Gong, G. The impact of machine studying regression algorithms and pattern measurement on individualized behavioral prediction with practical connectivity options. Neuroimage 178, 622–637 (2018).
Google Scholar
Dhamala, E., Yeo, B. T. T. & Holmes, A. J. One measurement doesn’t match all: methodological concerns for brain-based predictive modeling in psychiatry. Biol. Psychiatry 93, 717–728 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gao, S., Greene, A. S., Constable, R. T. & Scheinost, D. Combining a number of connectomes improves predictive modeling of phenotypic measures. Neuroimage 201, 116038 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, M. et al. Connectome-based machine studying fashions are susceptible to refined knowledge manipulations. Patterns 4, 100756 (2023).
Google Scholar
Greene, A. S. et al. Mind-phenotype fashions fail for people who defy pattern stereotypes. Nature 609, 109–118 (2022).
Google Scholar
Li, J. et al. Cross-ethnicity/race generalization failure of behavioral prediction from resting-state practical connectivity. Sci. Adv. 8, eabj1812 (2022).
Google Scholar
Botvinik-Nezer, R. et al. Variability within the evaluation of a single neuroimaging dataset by many groups. Nature 582, 84–88 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kang, Ok. et al. Research design options enhance replicability in brain-wide affiliation research. Nature 636, 719–727 (2024).
Google Scholar
Klapwijk, E. T., van den Bos, W., Tamnes, C. Ok., Raschle, N. M. & Mills, Ok. L. Alternatives for elevated reproducibility and replicability of developmental neuroimaging. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 47, 100902 (2020).
Google Scholar
Liu, S., Abdellaoui, A., Verweij, Ok. J. H. & van Wingen, G. A. Replicable mind–phenotype associations require large-scale neuroimaging knowledge. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 1344–1356 (2023).
Google Scholar
Marek, S. et al. Reproducible brain-wide affiliation research require 1000’s of people. Nature 603, 654–660 (2022).
Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, M. et al. Energy and reproducibility within the exterior validation of brain-phenotype predictions. Nat. Hum. Behav. (2024).
Google Scholar
Adkinson, B. D. et al. Mind-phenotype predictions of language and govt operate can survive throughout various real-world knowledge: dataset shifts in developmental populations. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 70, 101464 (2024).
Google Scholar
Marek, S. & Laumann, T. O. Replicability and generalizability in inhabitants psychiatric neuroimaging. Neuropsychopharmacology 50, 52–57 (2024).
Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. D. & Finn, E. S. Methods to set up sturdy mind–habits relationships with out 1000’s of people. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 835–837 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wu, J. et al. Cross-cohort replicability and generalizability of connectivity-based psychometric prediction patterns. Neuroimage 262, 119569 (2022).
Google Scholar
Jiang, R., Woo, C.-W., Qi, S., Wu, J. & Sui, J. Deciphering mind biomarkers: challenges and options in decoding machine learning-based predictive neuroimaging. IEEE Sign Course of. Magazine 39, 107–118 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kohoutová, L. et al. Towards a unified framework for decoding machine-learning fashions in neuroimaging. Nat. Protoc. 15, 1399–1435 (2020).
Google Scholar
Rudin, C. Cease explaining black field machine studying fashions for top stakes choices and use interpretable fashions as a substitute. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 206–215 (2019).
Google Scholar
Tejavibulya, L. et al. Predicting the way forward for neuroimaging predictive fashions in psychological well being. Mol. Psychiatry 27, 3129–3137 (2022).
Google Scholar
Allen, E. A., Erhardt, E. B. & Calhoun, V. D. Information visualization within the neurosciences: overcoming the curse of dimensionality. Neuron 74, 603–608 (2012).
Google Scholar
Tian, Y. & Zalesky, A. Machine studying prediction of cognition from practical connectivity: are function weights dependable? Neuroimage 245, 118648 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chen, J. et al. Relationship between prediction accuracy and have significance reliability: an empirical and theoretical research. Neuroimage 274, 120115 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mwangi, B., Tian, T. S. & Soares, J. C. A evaluate of function discount strategies in neuroimaging. Neuroinformatics 12, 229–244 (2014).
Google Scholar
Yeung, A. W. Ok., Extra, S., Wu, J. & Eickhoff, S. B. Reporting particulars of neuroimaging research on particular person traits prediction: a literature survey. Neuroimage 256, 119275 (2022).
Google Scholar
Noble, S., Mejia, A. F., Zalesky, A. & Scheinost, D. Bettering energy in practical magnetic resonance imaging by transferring past cluster-level inference. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2203020119 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cremers, H. R., Wager, T. D. & Yarkoni, T. The relation between statistical energy and inference in fMRI. PLoS ONE 12, e0184923 (2017).
Google Scholar
Noble, S., Curtiss, J., Pessoa, L. & Scheinost, D. The tip of the iceberg: a name to embrace anti-localizationism in human neuroscience analysis. Imaging Neurosci. (Camb.) 2, imag-2-00138 (2024).
Google Scholar
Alexander, L. M. et al. An open useful resource for transdiagnostic analysis in pediatric psychological well being and studying issues. Sci. Information 4, 170181 (2017).
Google Scholar
Casey, B. J. et al. The Adolescent Mind Cognitive Improvement (ABCD) research: imaging acquisition throughout 21 websites. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 32, 43–54 (2018).
Google Scholar
Somerville, L. H. et al. The Lifespan Human Connectome Mission in Improvement: a large-scale research of mind connectivity growth in 5–21 12 months olds. Neuroimage 183, 456–468 (2018).
Google Scholar
Satterthwaite, T. D. et al. The Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort: a publicly accessible useful resource for the research of regular and irregular mind growth in youth. Neuroimage 124, 1115–1119 (2016).
Google Scholar
Shen, X. et al. Utilizing connectome-based predictive modeling to foretell particular person habits from mind connectivity. Nat. Protoc. 12, 506–518 (2017).
Google Scholar
Foster, M. L., Ye, J., Powers, A. R., Dvornek, N. C. & Scheinost, D. Connectome-based predictive modeling of early and power psychosis signs. Neuropsychopharmacology 50, 877–885 (2025).
Google Scholar
Chandler, S. et al. Validation of the social communication questionnaire in a inhabitants cohort of youngsters with autism spectrum issues. J. Am. Acad. Youngster Adolesc. Psychiatry 46, 1324–1332 (2007).
Google Scholar
Hoerl, A. E. & Kennard, R. W. Ridge regression: purposes to nonorthogonal issues. Technometrics 12, 69–82 (1970).
Google Scholar
Haufe, S. et al. On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear fashions in multivariate neuroimaging. Neuroimage 87, 96–110 (2014).
Google Scholar
Burt, J. B., Helmer, M., Shinn, M., Anticevic, A. & Murray, J. D. Generative modeling of mind maps with spatial autocorrelation. Neuroimage 220, 117038 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shinn, M. et al. Useful mind networks mirror spatial and temporal autocorrelation. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 867–878 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dubois, J., Galdi, P., Paul, L. Ok. & Adolphs, R. A distributed mind community predicts common intelligence from resting-state human neuroimaging knowledge. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20170284 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Castillo, J. et al. Entire-brain, time-locked activation with easy duties revealed utilizing huge averaging and model-free evaluation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 5487–5492 (2012).
Google Scholar
Westlin, C. et al. Bettering the research of mind–habits relationships by revisiting fundamental assumptions. Tendencies Cogn. Sci. 27, 246–257 (2023).
Google Scholar
Machado, T. A., Kauvar, I. V. & Deisseroth, Ok. Multiregion neuronal exercise: the forest and the bushes. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 683–704 (2022).
Google Scholar
Tremblay, S., Testard, C., Inchauspé, J. & Petrides, M. Epiphenomenal neural exercise within the primate cortex. Preprint at bioRxiv (2023).
Dockès, J., Varoquaux, G. & Poline, J.-B. Stopping dataset shift from breaking machine-learning biomarkers. GigaScience 10, giab055 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yarkoni, T. The generalizability disaster. Behav. Mind Sci. 45, e1 (2020).
Google Scholar
Taylor, P. A. et al. Spotlight outcomes, don’t cover them: improve interpretation, cut back biases and enhance reproducibility. Neuroimage 274, 120138 (2023).
Google Scholar
Makowski, C. et al. Leveraging the Adolescent Mind Cognitive Improvement research to enhance behavioral prediction from neuroimaging in smaller replication samples. Cereb. Cortex 34, bhae223 (2024).
Google Scholar
Tozzi, L., Fleming, S. L., Taylor, Z. D., Raterink, C. D. & Williams, L. M. Check–retest reliability of the human practical connectome over consecutive days: figuring out extremely dependable parts and assessing the affect of methodological selections. Netw. Neurosci. 4, 925–945 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Intra-session take a look at–retest reliability of practical connectivity in infants. Neuroimage 239, 118284 (2021).
Google Scholar
Amico, E. & Goñi, J. The search for identifiability in human practical connectomes. Sci. Rep. 8, 8254 (2018).
Google Scholar
Graff, Ok. et al. Benchmarking widespread preprocessing methods in early childhood practical connectivity and intersubject correlation fMRI. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 54, 101087 (2022).
Google Scholar
Horien, C., Shen, X., Scheinost, D. & Constable, R. T. The person practical connectome is exclusive and steady over months to years. NeuroImage 189, 676–687 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kaufmann, T. et al. Delayed stabilization and individualization in connectome growth are associated to psychiatric issues. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 513–515 (2017).
Google Scholar
Noble, S., Scheinost, D. & Constable, R. T. A decade of take a look at–retest reliability of practical connectivity: a scientific evaluate and meta-analysis. Neuroimage 203, 116157 (2019).
Google Scholar
Vanderwal, T. et al. Particular person variations in practical connectivity throughout naturalistic viewing circumstances. Neuroimage 157, 521–530 (2017).
Google Scholar
Sizemore, A. E. et al. Cliques and cavities within the human connectome. J. Comput. Neurosci. 44, 115–145 (2018).
Google Scholar
Smith, S. M. et al. Mind ageing includes many modes of structural and practical change with distinct genetic and biophysical associations. Elife 9, e52677 (2020).
Google Scholar
Niu, X., Taylor, A., Shinohara, R. T., Kounios, J. & Zhang, F. Multidimensional brain-age prediction reveals altered mind developmental trajectory in psychiatric issues. Cereb. Cortex 32, 5036–5049 (2022).
Google Scholar
Anbarasi, J., Kumari, R., Ganesh, M. & Agrawal, R. Translational connectomics: overview of machine studying in macroscale connectomics for medical insights. BMC Neurol. 24, 364 (2024).
Google Scholar
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep studying. Nature 521, 436–444 (2015).
Google Scholar
Snoek, L., Miletić, S. & Scholte, H. S. Methods to management for confounds in decoding analyses of neuroimaging knowledge. Neuroimage 184, 741–760 (2019).
Google Scholar
Brucar, L. R., Feczko, E., Honest, D. A. & Zilverstand, A. Present approaches in computational psychiatry for the data-driven identification of brain-based subtypes. Biol. Psychiatry 93, 704–716 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hong, S.-J. et al. Towards neurosubtypes in autism. Biol. Psychiatry 88, 111–128 (2020).
Google Scholar
Pettorruso, M. et al. Habit biotypes: a paradigm shift for future therapy methods? Mol. Psychiatry 29, 1450–1452 (2024).
Google Scholar
Williams, L. M. Defining biotypes for melancholy and anxiousness based mostly on large-scale circuit dysfunction: a theoretical evaluate of the proof and future instructions for medical translation. Depress. Nervousness 34, 9–24 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhao, Q. et al. The transition from homogeneous to heterogeneous machine studying in neuropsychiatric analysis. Biol. Psychiatry Glob. Open Sci. 5, 100397 (2024).
Google Scholar
Buch, A. M. et al. Molecular and network-level mechanisms explaining particular person variations in autism spectrum dysfunction. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 650–663 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, P. et al. 4 distinct subtypes of Alzheimer’s illness based mostly on resting-state connectivity biomarkers. Biol. Psychiatry 93, 759–769 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dinga, R. et al. Evaluating the proof for biotypes of melancholy: methodological replication and extension of Drysdale et al. (2017). Neuroimage Clin. 22, 101796 (2019).
Google Scholar
Drysdale, A. T. et al. Resting-state connectivity biomarkers outline neurophysiological subtypes of melancholy. Nat. Med. 23, 28–38 (2017).
Google Scholar
Esterman, M. et al. Evaluating the proof for a neuroimaging subtype of posttraumatic stress dysfunction. Sci. Transl. Med. 12, eaaz9343 (2020).
Google Scholar
Etkin, A. et al. Utilizing fMRI connectivity to outline a treatment-resistant type of post-traumatic stress dysfunction. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaal3236 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jiang, Y. et al. Neuroimaging biomarkers outline neurophysiological subtypes with distinct trajectories in schizophrenia. Nat. Ment. Well being 1, 186–199 (2023).
Google Scholar
Murray, L., Frederick, B. B. & Janes, A. C. Information-driven connectivity profiles relate to smoking cessation outcomes. Neuropsychopharmacology 49, 1007–1013 (2024).
Google Scholar
Pagani, M. et al. Organic subtyping of autism through cross-species fMRI. Preprint at bioRxiv (2025).
Wen, Z. et al. Neuroimaging-based variability in subtyping biomarkers for psychiatric heterogeneity. Mol. Psychiatry (2024).
Google Scholar
Lee, T. Y., Jo, H. J., Koike, S. & Raballo, A. Editorial: biotyping in psychiatry. Entrance. Psychiatry 13, 844206 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bolognini, N. & Ro, T. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: disrupting neural exercise to change and assess mind operate. J. Neurosci. 30, 9647–9650 (2010).
Google Scholar
Luber, B. et al. Utilizing diffusion tensor imaging to successfully goal TMS to deep mind buildings. Neuroimage 249, 118863 (2022).
Google Scholar
McPartland, J. C. Growing clinically practicable biomarkers for autism spectrum dysfunction. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 47, 2935–2937 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yip, S. W., Kiluk, B. & Scheinost, D. Towards dependancy prediction: an summary of cross-validated predictive modeling findings and concerns for future neuroimaging analysis. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 5, 748–758 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chekroud, A. M. et al. Illusory generalizability of medical prediction fashions. Science 383, 164–167 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kopal, J., Uddin, L. Q. & Bzdok, D. The top sport: respecting main sources of inhabitants variety. Nat. Strategies 20, 1122–1128 (2023).
Google Scholar
Quinonero-Candela, J., Sugiyama, M., Schwaighofer, A. & Lawrence, N. D. Dataset Shift in Machine Studying (MIT Press, 2022).
Horien, C., Greene, A. S., Constable, R. T. & Scheinost, D. Areas and connections: complementary approaches to characterize mind group and performance. Neuroscientist 26, 117–133 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bzdok, D., Wolf, G. & Kopal, J. Harnessing inhabitants variety: looking for instruments of the commerce. GigaScience 13, giae068 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ge, J. et al. Growing variety in connectomics with the Chinese language Human Connectome Mission. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 163–172 (2023).
Google Scholar
Satterthwaite, T. D. et al. Neuroimaging of the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort. Neuroimage 86, 544–553 (2014).
Google Scholar
Gur, R. C. et al. A cognitive neuroscience based mostly computerized battery for environment friendly measurement of particular person variations: standardization and preliminary assemble validation. J. Neurosci. Strategies 187, 254–262 (2010).
Google Scholar
Wilkinson, G. S. & Robertson, G. J. Broad Vary Achievement Check 4 (APA PsycTests, 2006); https://doi.org/10.1037/t27160-000.
Dickens, R. H., Meisinger, E. B. & Tarar, J. M. Check evaluate: Complete Check of Phonological Processing—2nd ed. (CTOPP-2) by Wagner, R. Ok., Torgesen, J. Ok., Rashotte, C. A., & Pearson, N. A. Can. J. Sch. Psychol. 30, 155–162 (2015).
Google Scholar
Tarar, J. M., Meisinger, E. B. & Dickens, R. H. Check evaluate: Check of Phrase Studying Effectivity—Second Version (TOWRE-2) by Torgesen, J. Ok., Wagner, R. Ok., & Rashotte, C. A. Can. J. Sch. Psychol. 30, 320–326 (2015).
Google Scholar
Weintraub, S. et al. Cognition evaluation utilizing the NIH Toolbox. Neurology 80, S54–S64 (2013).
Google Scholar
Goodman, A., Lamping, D. L. & Ploubidis, G. B. When to make use of broader internalising and externalising subscales as a substitute of the hypothesised 5 subscales on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): knowledge from British dad and mom, lecturers and kids. J. Abnorm. Youngster Psychol. 38, 1179–1191 (2010).
Google Scholar
Goodman, R. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a analysis observe. J. Youngster Psychol. Psychiatry 38, 581–586 (1997).
Google Scholar
Birmaher, B. et al. Psychometric properties of the Display screen for Youngster Nervousness Associated Emotional Problems (SCARED): a replication research. J. Am. Acad. Youngster Adolesc. Psychiatry 38, 1230–1236 (1999).
Google Scholar
Conners, C. Ok. Conners’ Score Scales—Revised (North Multi-Well being Methods, 2001).
Younger, Ok. S. Web dependancy: the emergence of a brand new medical dysfunction. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 1, 237–244 (1998).
Google Scholar
Harms, M. P. et al. Extending the Human Connectome Mission throughout ages: imaging protocols for the Lifespan Improvement and Growing older tasks. Neuroimage 183, 972–984 (2018).
Google Scholar
Garavan, H. et al. Recruiting the ABCD pattern: design concerns and procedures. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 32, 16–22 (2018).
Google Scholar
Papademetris, X. et al. BioImage Suite: an built-in medical picture evaluation suite: an replace. Perception J 2006, 209 (2006).
Google Scholar
Shen, X., Tokoglu, F., Papademetris, X. & Constable, R. T. Groupwise whole-brain parcellation from resting-state fMRI knowledge for community node identification. Neuroimage 82, 403–415 (2013).
Google Scholar
Elliott, M. L. et al. Common practical connectivity: shared options of resting-state and job fMRI drive dependable and heritable particular person variations in practical mind networks. Neuroimage 189, 516–532 (2019).
Google Scholar
Yeh, F.-C., Liu, L., Hitchens, T. Ok. & Wu, Y. L. Mapping immune cell infiltration utilizing restricted diffusion MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 77, 603–612 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yeh, F.-C., Wedeen, V. J. & Tseng, W.-Y. I. Generalized q-sampling imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29, 1626–1635 (2010).
Google Scholar
Gu, S. et al. The vitality panorama of neurophysiological exercise implicit in mind community construction. Sci. Rep. 8, 2507 (2018).
Google Scholar
Solar, H. et al. Community controllability of structural connectomes within the neonatal mind. Nat. Commun. 14, 5820 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yeh, F.-C., Verstynen, T. D., Wang, Y., Fernández-Miranda, J. C. & Tseng, W.-Y. I. Deterministic diffusion fiber monitoring improved by quantitative anisotropy. PLoS ONE 8, e80713 (2013).
Google Scholar
Adkinson, B. D. & Chekroud, A. M. Broadening the usage of machine studying in psychiatry. Biol. Psychiatry 93, 4–5 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, J., Patil, Ok. R., Yeo, B. T. T. & Eickhoff, S. B. Leveraging machine studying for gaining neurobiological and nosological insights in psychiatric analysis. Biol. Psychiatry 93, 18–28 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hsu, W.-T., Rosenberg, M. D., Scheinost, D., Constable, R. T. & Chun, M. M. Resting-state practical connectivity predicts neuroticism and extraversion in novel people. Soc. Cogn. Have an effect on. Neurosci. 13, 224–232 (2018).
Google Scholar
Garrison, Ok. A. et al. Transdiagnostic connectome-based prediction of craving. Am. J. Psychiatry 180, 445–453 (2023).
Google Scholar
