NEW YORK (AP) — A U.S. civil rights company has decided that the federal authorities can bar transgender staff from utilizing loos aligned with their gender id, dismissing an enchantment from a transgender girl who labored for the U.S. Military.
The Equal Employment Alternative Fee determined Thursday towards a civilian IT specialist who labored for the Military at Fort Riley, Kansas. The EEOC repeatedly declared her to be man despite the fact that the employee knowledgeable her managers that she recognized as a girl in the summertime of 2025 when she requested to make use of loos and locker rooms aligned along with her gender id. Her request was declined and he or she filed a grievance with the Military, which was dismissed.
The worker, who was not recognized, appealed to the EEOC, which determined towards her, citing President Donald Trump’s government order saying the federal authorities would solely acknowledge two immutable sexes, female and male.
The EEOC’s sole Democratic commissioner, Kalpana Kotagal, dissented within the 2-1 resolution, which she and LGBTQ rights advocates criticized as denying the existence of transgender folks. The opinion drew reward from conservative advocates who’ve accused the EEOC of overstepping its authority on gender id points throughout earlier administrations.
The opinion retreated from the EEOC’s landmark discovering a decade in the past that one other transgender Military worker had been discriminated towards as a result of her employer refused to make use of her most popular pronouns or enable her to make use of loos based mostly on her gender id. In its new discovering, the EEOC discovered that the Military’s resolution didn’t violate Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination on the premise of intercourse, race, faith and nationwide id.
EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas has aggressively moved to implement Trump’s orders regarding gender id, dropping lawsuits on behalf of transgender and nonbinary staff who had been fired or harassed, and amending harassment tips to exclude language stating that intentionally misgendering staff or barring them from loos aligned with their gender id may represent harassment.
“Today’s opinion is consistent with the plain meaning of ‘sex’ as understood by Congress at the time Title VII was enacted, as well as longstanding civil rights principles: that similarly situated employees must be treated equally,” Lucas mentioned in a press release. “Biology is not bigotry.”
The EEOC’s argued that decoding Title VII as permitting “trans-identifying” staff into loos of their gender id could be tantamount to eliminating single-sex amenities.
“All bathrooms would be mixed-sex by law, and every employee would be required to perform bodily and other private functions in the presence of the opposite-sex,” the EEOC wrote.
In a press release explaining her dissent, Kotagal mentioned “the decision rests on the false premise that transgender workers are not worthy of the agency’s protection from discrimination and harassment and that protecting them threatens the rights of other workers. Worse, it suggests that transgender people do not exist.”
A number of transgender and gender nonconforming federal staff have filed formal discrimination complaints over the Trump administration’s insurance policies, which have included stripping authorities web sites of “gender ideology” and reinstituting a ban on transgender service members within the army.
In a quasi-judicial perform, the EEOC handles appeals by federal staff whose complaints have been dismissed by their company’s civil rights workplaces.
Thursday’s resolution applies to all federal businesses however to not personal employers, and it doesn’t set a precedent that U.S. courts should observe. Within the case of personal sector staff, the EEOC investigates complaints and may determine whether or not to file lawsuits on their behalf, however doesn’t concern selections.
Dan Lennington, deputy counsel on the conservative Wisconsin Institute for Legislation & Liberty, mentioned personal employers ought to nonetheless take notice as a result of the choice signifies that EEOC is unlikely to behave towards them for prohibiting transgender folks from accessing loos of the gender id.
“We are very optimistic and believe that the EEOC is headed in the right direction,” mentioned Lennington, whose group is representing a employee who filed a cost earlier than the EEOC alleging non secular discrimination after he was fired for asking to not use pronouns most popular by transgender colleagues.
The Military worker can file a request with the EEOC for reconsideration inside 30 days, or she will file a brand new case in federal district court docket with 90 days, based on the EEOC.
In her assertion, Kotagal argued {that a} landmark 2020 Supreme Courtroom ruling, Bostock V. Clayton Nation, strengthened that Title VII protects transgender staff from discrimination, and he or she criticizes the EEOC for “rushing” its resolution whereas a federal district court docket is addressing related points in a category motion case filed federal staff.
However in its resolution, the EEOC argued that Bostock solely established that employers can not fireplace transgender staff or refuse to rent them based mostly on their gender id, making no resolution on the difficulty of loos or locker rooms or on the definition of intercourse.
Echoing a stance lengthy held by Lucas, the EEOC argued that permitting transgender staff into loos and locker rooms of their alternative could be harmful to girls, violating their expectations for privateness in such areas. That reasoning rested on the EEOC’s repeated argument that the U.S. Military worker just isn’t a girl and actually was demanding “special treatment” by asking to be allowed into a toilet of “the opposite sex.”
The EEOC cited Trump’s government order and numerous dictionary entries in an in depth rationalization of its insistence that “the complainant’s sex is male, from the moment of his conception and continuing even after he began to identify as transgender.”
Social conservatives have applauded that view however the American Medical Affiliation and different mainstream medical teams have mentioned intensive scientific analysis suggests intercourse and gender are higher understood as a spectrum than as an either-or definition. Some biologists have criticized Trump’s government order as scientifically unsound as a result of amongst different issues, it sidesteps variations that embrace intersex folks, who’ve bodily traits that don’t match typical definitions for male or feminine classes. In a footnote, the EEOC mentioned intersex people current “rare and unique circumstances” that “can be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.”
“For too long, federal agencies have stretched civil rights statutes beyond their plain meaning. By grounding its reasoning in statutory text and ordinary meaning, the EEOC has reinforced that ‘sex’ under Title VII refers to an individual’s immutable biological classification as male or female at birth,” mentioned Parlato, senior authorized counsel of the conservative Impartial Girls’s Legislation Middle.
The Congressional Equality Caucus and a number of other civil rights advocacy teams, together with the Human Rights Marketing campaign and the Nationwide Girls’s Legislation Middle, mentioned the EEOC’s resolution leaves transgender staff weak to hostile work environments with little recourse for reduction.
“Andrea Lucas has spent her time leading EEOC undermining enforcement of minority workers’ rights — she’s exactly who the Commission was designed to fight back against,” mentioned Rep. Mark Takano, chair of the Congressional Equality Caucus.
The Protection Division referred inquiries to the Division of Justice and the Military, which didn’t instantly reply to requests for remark.
_____
AP Enterprise Author Claire Savage contributed to this report from Chicago.
______
The Related Press’ girls within the workforce and state authorities protection receives monetary help from Pivotal Ventures. AP is solely accountable for all content material. Discover AP’s requirements for working with philanthropies, a listing of supporters and funded protection areas at AP.org.
Copyright
© 2026 The Related Press. All rights reserved. This web site just isn’t supposed for customers situated inside the European Financial Space.
