Svensson, V., Vento-Tormo, R. & Teichmann, S. A. Exponential scaling of single-cell RNA-seq prior to now decade. Nat. Protoc. 13, 599–604 (2018).
Google Scholar
Leek, J. T. et al. Tackling the widespread and significant influence of batch results in high-throughput knowledge. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 733–739 (2010).
Google Scholar
Luecken, M. D. et al. Benchmarking atlas-level knowledge integration in single-cell genomics. Nat. Strategies 19, 41–50 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ahlmann-Eltze, C. & Huber, W. Comparability of transformations for single-cell RNA-seq knowledge. Nat. Strategies 20, 665–672 (2023).
Google Scholar
Younger, M. D. & Behjati, S. SoupX removes ambient RNA contamination from droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing knowledge. GigaScience 9, giaa151 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zappia, L. et al. Characteristic choice strategies have an effect on the efficiency of scRNA-seq knowledge integration and querying. Nat. Strategies 22, 834–844 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhang, B. et al. A human embryonic limb cell atlas resolved in house and time. Nature (2023).
Nguyen, H. C. T., Baik, B., Yoon, S., Park, T. & Nam, D. Benchmarking integration of single-cell differential expression. Nat. Commun. 14, 1570 (2023).
Google Scholar
Xi, N. M. & Li, J. J. Benchmarking computational doublet-detection strategies for single-cell RNA sequencing knowledge. Cell Syst. 12, 176–194.e6 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chazarra-Gil, R., van Dongen, S., Kiselev, V. Y. & Hemberg, M. Versatile comparability of batch correction strategies for single-cell RNA-seq utilizing BatchBench. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, e42 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tran, H. T. N. et al. A benchmark of batch-effect correction strategies for single-cell RNA sequencing knowledge. Genome Biol 21, 12 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sikkema, L. et al. An built-in cell atlas of the lung in well being and illness. Nat. Med. 29, 1563–1577 (2023).
Google Scholar
Travaglini, Ok. J. et al. A molecular cell atlas of the human lung from single-cell RNA sequencing. Nature 587, 619–625 (2020).
Google Scholar
Vieira Braga, F. A. et al. A mobile census of human lungs identifies novel cell states in well being and in bronchial asthma. Nat. Med. 25, 1153–1163 (2019).
Google Scholar
Smith, Ok. S. et al. Lack of proof for the transitional cerebellar progenitor. Nature 643, E1–E8 (2025).
Google Scholar
Luo, Z. et al. Multimodal validation of the existence of transitional cerebellar progenitors within the human fetal cerebellum. Preprint at bioRxiv (2025).
Koenitzer, J. R., Wu, H., Atkinson, J. J., Brody, S. L. & Humphreys, B. D. Single-nucleus RNA-sequencing profiling of mouse lung. lowered dissociation bias and improved uncommon cell-type detection in contrast with single-cell RNA sequencing. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 63, 739–747 (2020).
Google Scholar
Fleming, S. J. et al. Unsupervised removing of systematic background noise from droplet-based single-cell experiments utilizing CellBender. Nat. Strategies 20, 1323–1335 (2023).
Google Scholar
Berg, M. et al. FastCAR: quick correction for ambient RNA to facilitate differential gene expression evaluation in single-cell RNA-sequencing datasets. BMC Genomics 24, 722 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sheng, C. et al. Probabilistic machine studying ensures correct ambient denoising in droplet-based single-cell omics. Preprint at bioRxiv (2022).
Yang, S. et al. Decontamination of ambient RNA in single-cell RNA-seq with DecontX. Genome Biol. 21, 57 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, W. et al. scCDC: a computational methodology for gene-specific contamination detection and correction in single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq knowledge. Genome Biol. 25, 136 (2024).
Google Scholar
Janssen, P. et al. The impact of background noise and its removing on the evaluation of single-cell expression knowledge. Genome Biol. 24, 140 (2023).
Google Scholar
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. Ok. edgeR: a Bioconductor bundle for differential expression evaluation of digital gene expression knowledge. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).
Google Scholar
Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray research. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).
Google Scholar
Risso, D., Perraudeau, F., Gribkova, S., Dudoit, S. & Vert, J.-P. A basic and versatile methodology for sign extraction from single-cell RNA-seq knowledge. Nat. Commun. 9, 284 (2018).
Google Scholar
Jiang, R., Solar, T., Music, D. & Li, J. J. Statistics or biology: the zero-inflation controversy about scRNA-seq knowledge. Genome Biol. 23, 31 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kim, T. H., Zhou, X. & Chen, M. Demystifying “drop-outs” in single-cell UMI knowledge. Genome Biol. 21, 196 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sarkar, A. & Stephens, M. Separating measurement and expression fashions clarifies confusion in single-cell RNA sequencing evaluation. Nat. Genet. 53, 770–777 (2021).
Google Scholar
Svensson, V. Droplet scRNA-seq just isn’t zero-inflated. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 147–150 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lun, A. T. L., Bach, Ok. & Marioni, J. C. Pooling throughout cells to normalize single-cell RNA sequencing knowledge with many zero counts. Genome Biol. 17, 75 (2016).
Google Scholar
Hafemeister, C. & Satija, R. Normalization and variance stabilization of single-cell RNA-seq knowledge utilizing regularized unfavourable binomial regression. Genome Biol. 20, 296 (2019).
Google Scholar
Heumos, L. et al. Finest practices for single-cell evaluation throughout modalities. Nat. Rev. Genet. 24, 550–572 (2023).
Google Scholar
Vieth, B., Parekh, S., Ziegenhain, C., Enard, W. & Hellmann, I. A scientific analysis of single cell RNA-seq evaluation pipelines. Nat. Commun. 10, 4667 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cole, M. B. et al. Efficiency evaluation and number of normalization procedures for single-cell RNA-seq. Cell Syst. 8, 315–328.e8 (2019).
Google Scholar
Booeshaghi, A. S. & Pachter, L. Normalization of single-cell RNA-seq counts by log(x + 1) or log(1 + x). Bioinformatics 37, 2223–2224 (2021).
Google Scholar
Brennecke, P. et al. Accounting for technical noise in single-cell RNA-seq experiments. Nat. Strategies 10, 1093–1095 (2013).
Google Scholar
Jiang, L., Chen, H., Pinello, L. & Yuan, G.-C. GiniClust: detecting uncommon cell varieties from single-cell gene expression knowledge with Gini index. Genome Biol. 17, 144 (2016).
Google Scholar
Andrews, T. S. & Hemberg, M. M3Drop: dropout-based function choice for scRNASeq. Bioinformatics 35, 2865–2867 (2019).
Google Scholar
He, P. et al. A human fetal lung cell atlas uncovers proximal-distal gradients of differentiation and key regulators of epithelial fates. Cell 185, 4841–4860.e25 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ranjan, B. et al. DUBStepR is a scalable correlation-based function choice methodology for precisely clustering single-cell knowledge. Nat. Commun. 12, 5849 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wu, Y. E., Pan, L., Zuo, Y., Li, X. & Hong, W. Detecting activated cell populations utilizing single-cell RNA-seq. Neuron 96, 313–329.e6 (2017).
Google Scholar
Neuschulz, A. et al. A single-cell RNA labeling technique for measuring stress response upon tissue dissociation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 19, e11147 (2023).
Google Scholar
Tirosh, I. et al. Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanoma by single-cell RNA-seq. Science 352, 189–196 (2016).
Google Scholar
Park, J.-E. et al. A cell atlas of human thymic growth defines T cell repertoire formation. Science 367, eaay3224 (2020).
Google Scholar
Buettner, F. et al. Computational evaluation of cell-to-cell heterogeneity in single-cell RNA-sequencing knowledge reveals hidden subpopulations of cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 155–160 (2015).
Google Scholar
Scialdone, A. et al. Computational task of cell-cycle stage from single-cell transcriptome knowledge. Strategies 85, 54–61 (2015).
Google Scholar
Kumasaka, N. et al. Mapping interindividual dynamics of innate immune response at single-cell decision. Nat. Genet. 55, 1066–1075 (2023).
Google Scholar
Luecken, M. D. & Theis, F. J. Present finest practices in single-cell RNA-seq evaluation: a tutorial. Mol. Syst. Biol. 15, e8746 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhou, Y., Sheng, Q., Wang, G., Xu, L. & Jin, S. Quantifying batch results for particular person genes in single-cell knowledge. Nat. Comput. Sci. 5, 612–620 (2025).
Polański, Ok. et al. BBKNN: quick batch alignment of single cell transcriptomes. Bioinformatics 36, 964–965 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhu, Q. et al. Revealing a coherent cell-state panorama throughout single-cell datasets with CONCORD. Nat. Biotechnol. (2026).
Dincer, A. B., Janizek, J. D. & Lee, S.-I. Adversarial deconfounding autoencoder for studying strong gene expression embeddings. Bioinformatics 36, i573–i582 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ge, S., Wang, H., Alavi, A., Xing, E. & Bar-Joseph, Z. Supervised adversarial alignment of single-cell RNA-seq knowledge. J. Comput. Biol. 28, 501–513 (2021).
Google Scholar
Haghverdi, L., Lun, A. T. L., Morgan, M. D. & Marioni, J. C. Batch results in single-cell RNA-sequencing knowledge are corrected by matching mutual nearest neighbors. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 421–427 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lun, A. fastMNN description. GitHub (2019).
Hie, B., Bryson, B. & Berger, B. Environment friendly integration of heterogeneous single-cell transcriptomes utilizing Scanorama. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 685–691 (2019).
Google Scholar
Stuart, T. et al. Complete integration of single-cell knowledge. Cell 177, 1888–1902.e21 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lin, Y. et al. scMerge leverages issue evaluation, steady expression, and pseudoreplication to merge a number of single-cell RNA-seq datasets. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 9775–9784 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wang, X., Wang, J., Zhang, H., Huang, S. & Yin, Y. HDMC: a novel deep learning-based framework for eradicating batch results in single-cell RNA-seq knowledge. Bioinformatics 38, 1295–1303 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, T. et al. BERMUDA: a novel deep switch studying methodology for single-cell RNA sequencing batch correction reveals hidden high-resolution mobile subtypes. Genome Biol. 20, 165 (2019).
Google Scholar
Welch, J. D. et al. Single-cell multi-omic integration compares and contrasts options of mind cell identification. Cell 177, 1873–1887.e17 (2019).
Google Scholar
Li, X. et al. Deep studying permits correct clustering with batch impact removing in single-cell RNA-seq evaluation. Nat. Commun. 11, 2338 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lakkis, J. et al. A joint deep studying mannequin permits simultaneous batch impact correction, denoising, and clustering in single-cell transcriptomics. Genome Res. 31, 1753–1766 (2021).
Google Scholar
Moinfar, A. A. & Theis, F. J. Unsupervised deep disentangled illustration of single-cell omics. Preprint at bioRxiv (2024).
Amodio, M. et al. Exploring single-cell knowledge with deep multitasking neural networks. Nat. Strategies 16, 1139–1145 (2019).
Google Scholar
Richter, T., Bahrami, M., Xia, Y., Fischer, D. S. & Theis, F. J. Delineating the efficient use of self-supervised studying in single-cell genomics. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 68–78 (2024).
Google Scholar
Xu, C. et al. Computerized cell-type harmonization and integration throughout Human Cell Atlas datasets. Cell 186, 5876–5891.e20 (2023).
Google Scholar
Xu, C. et al. Probabilistic harmonization and annotation of single-cell transcriptomics knowledge with deep generative fashions. Mol. Syst. Biol. 17, e9620 (2021).
Google Scholar
De Donno, C. et al. Inhabitants-level integration of single-cell datasets permits multi-scale evaluation throughout samples. Nat. Strategies 20, 1683–1692 (2023).
Google Scholar
Boyeau, P. et al. Deep generative modeling of sample-level heterogeneity in single-cell genomics. Nat. Strategies 22, 2264–2274 (2025).
Google Scholar
Aliee, H. et al. inVAE: Conditionally invariant illustration studying for producing multivariate single-cell reference maps. Preprint at bioRxiv (2024).
Megas, S. et al. Integrating multi-covariate disentanglement with counterfactual evaluation on artificial knowledge permits cell kind discovery and counterfactual predictions. Preprint at bioRxiv (2025).
Piran, Z., Cohen, N., Hoshen, Y. & Nitzan, M. Disentanglement of single-cell knowledge with biolord. Nat. Biotechnol. (2024).
Zhang, Z., Zhao, X., Bindra, M., Qiu, P. & Zhang, X. scDisInFact: disentangled studying for integration and prediction of multi-batch multi-condition single-cell RNA-sequencing knowledge. Nat. Commun. 15, 912 (2024).
Google Scholar
Dann, E. et al. Exact identification of cell states altered in illness utilizing wholesome single-cell references. Nat. Genet. 55, 1998–2008 (2023).
Google Scholar
Aran, D. et al. Reference-based evaluation of lung single-cell sequencing reveals a transitional profibrotic macrophage. Nat. Immunol. 20, 163–172 (2019).
Google Scholar
Domínguez Conde, C. et al. Cross-tissue immune cell evaluation reveals tissue-specific options in people. Science 376, eabl5197 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lotfollahi, M. et al. Mapping single-cell knowledge to reference atlases by switch studying. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 121–130 (2022).
Google Scholar
Theodoris, C. V. et al. Switch studying permits predictions in community biology. Nature 618, 616–624 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hao, M. et al. Massive-scale basis mannequin on single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Strategies 21, 1481–1491 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yang, F. et al. scBERT as a large-scale pretrained deep language mannequin for cell kind annotation of single-cell RNA-seq knowledge. Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 852–866 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cui, H. et al. scGPT: towards constructing a basis mannequin for single-cell multi-omics utilizing generative AI. Nat. Strategies (2024).
Rosen, Y. et al. Common cell embeddings: a basis mannequin for cell biology. Preprint at bioRxiv (2023).
Yang, X. et al. GeneCompass: deciphering common gene regulatory mechanisms with a knowledge-informed cross-species basis mannequin. Cell Res. 34, 830–845 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kalfon, J., Samaran, J., Peyré, G. & Cantini, L. scPRINT: pre-training on 50 million cells permits strong gene community predictions. Nat. Commun. 16, 3607 (2025).
Google Scholar
Ding, J. et al. Towards a privacy-preserving predictive basis mannequin of single-cell transcriptomics with federated studying and tabular modeling. Preprint at bioRxiv (2025).
Heimberg, G. et al. A cell atlas basis mannequin for scalable search of comparable human cells. Nature 638, 1085–1094 (2025).
Google Scholar
Kedzierska, Ok. Z., Crawford, L., Amini, A. P. & Lu, A. X. Zero-shot analysis reveals limitations of single-cell basis fashions. Genome Biol. 26, 101 (2025).
Google Scholar
Liu, T., Li, Ok., Wang, Y., Li, H. & Zhao, H. Evaluating the utilities of basis fashions in single-cell knowledge evaluation. Preprint at bioRxiv (2024).
Lotfollahi, M., Yuhan Hao, Theis, F. J. & Satija, R. The way forward for speedy and automatic single-cell knowledge evaluation utilizing reference mapping. Cell 187, 2343–2358 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hsu, J. et al. Evaluating 10x Genomics single-cell 3′ and 5′ assay in short-and long-read sequencing. Preprint at bioRxiv (2022).
Thrupp, N. et al. Single-nucleus RNA-seq just isn’t appropriate for detection of microglial activation genes in people. Cell Rep. 32, 108189 (2020).
Google Scholar
Huang, Y.-N. et al. The systematic evaluation of completeness of public metadata accompanying omics research. Preprint at bioRxiv (2022).
Wang, H., Leskovec, J. & Regev, A. Limitations of cell embedding metrics assessed utilizing drifting islands. Nat. Biotechnol. (2025).
Dann, E., Henderson, N. C., Teichmann, S. A., Morgan, M. D. & Marioni, J. C. Differential abundance testing on single-cell knowledge utilizing okay-nearest neighbor graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 245–253 (2022).
Google Scholar
Alsabbagh, A. R. et al. Basis fashions meet imbalanced single-cell knowledge when studying cell kind annotations. Preprint at bioRxiv (2023).
Maan, H. et al. Characterizing the impacts of dataset imbalance on single-cell knowledge integration. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 1899–1908 (2024).
Google Scholar
Cheng, F., Keller, M. S., Qu, H., Gehlenborg, N. & Wang, Q. Polyphony: an interactive switch studying framework for single-cell knowledge evaluation. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 29, 591–601 (2023).
Google Scholar
Osumi-Sutherland, D. et al. Cell kind ontologies of the Human Cell Atlas. Nat. Cell Biol. 23, 1129–1135 (2021).
Google Scholar
Metadata. Human Cell Atlas Knowledge Portal (2025).
Johnson, W. E., Li, C. & Rabinovic, A. Adjusting batch results in microarray expression knowledge utilizing empirical Bayes strategies. Biostatistics 8, 118–127 (2007).
Google Scholar
Korsunsky, I. et al. Quick, delicate and correct integration of single-cell knowledge with Concord. Nat. Strategies 16, 1289–1296 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lotfollahi, M., Wolf, F. A. & Theis, F. J. scGen predicts single-cell perturbation responses. Nat. Strategies 16, 715–721 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lopez, R., Regier, J., Cole, M. B., Jordan, M. I. & Yosef, N. Deep generative modeling for single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Strategies 15, 1053–1058 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lotfollahi, M., Naghipourfar, M., Theis, F. J. & Wolf, F. A. Conditional out-of-distribution era for unpaired knowledge utilizing switch VAE. Bioinformatics 36, i610–i617 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zeng, Y. et al. CellFM: a large-scale basis mannequin pre-trained on transcriptomics of 100 million human cells. Nat. Commun. 16, 4679 (2025).
Google Scholar
