Collias, D. & Beisel, C. L. CRISPR applied sciences and the seek for the PAM-free nuclease. Nat. Commun. 12, 555 (2021).
Google Scholar
Karvelis, T. et al. Fast characterization of CRISPR–Cas9 protospacer adjoining motif sequence components. Genome Biol. 16, 253 (2015).
Google Scholar
Gasiunas, G. et al. A list of biochemically numerous CRISPR–Cas9 orthologs. Nat. Commun. 11, 5512 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yan, W. X. et al. Functionally numerous sort V CRISPR–Cas techniques. Science 363, 88–91 (2019).
Google Scholar
Anzalone, A. V., Koblan, L. W. & Liu, D. R. Genome modifying with CRISPR–Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 824–844 (2020).
Google Scholar
Christie, Ok. A. et al. In direction of personalised allele-specific CRISPR gene modifying to deal with autosomal dominant issues. Sci. Rep. 7, 16174 (2017).
Google Scholar
Nishimasu, H. et al. Engineered CRISPR–Cas9 nuclease with expanded concentrating on area. Science 361, 1259–1262 (2018).
Google Scholar
Walton, R. T., Christie, Ok. A., Whittaker, M. N. & Kleinstiver, B. P. Unconstrained genome concentrating on with near-PAMless engineered CRISPR–Cas9 variants. Science 368, 290–296 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Engineered CRISPR–Cas12a variants with elevated actions and improved concentrating on ranges for gene, epigenetic and base modifying. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 276–282 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Broadening the concentrating on vary of Staphylococcus aureus CRISPR–Cas9 by modifying PAM recognition. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 1293–1298 (2015).
Google Scholar
Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Engineered CRISPR–Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature 523, 481–485 (2015).
Google Scholar
Hu, J. H. et al. Developed Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and excessive DNA specificity. Nature 556, 57–63 (2018).
Google Scholar
Huang, T. P. et al. Excessive-throughput steady evolution of compact Cas9 variants concentrating on single-nucleotide-pyrimidine PAMs. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 96–107 (2023).
Google Scholar
Miller, S. M. et al. Steady evolution of SpCas9 variants appropriate with non-G PAMs. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 471–481 (2020).
Google Scholar
Nijkamp, E., Ruffolo, J. A., Weinstein, E. N., Naik, N. & Madani, A. ProGen2: exploring the boundaries of protein language fashions. Cell Syst. 14, 968–978 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lin, Z. et al. Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein construction with a language mannequin. Science 379, 1123–1130 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ruffolo, J. A. et al. Design of extremely useful genome editors by modelling CRISPR–Cas sequences. Nature 645, 518–525 (2025).
Google Scholar
Meeske, A. J. & Marraffini, L. A. RNA information complementarity prevents self-targeting in sort VI CRISPR Methods. Mol. Cell 71, 791–801 (2018).
Google Scholar
Marraffini, L. A. & Sontheimer, E. J. CRISPR interference: RNA-directed adaptive immunity in micro organism and archaea. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 181–190 (2010).
Google Scholar
Camargo, A. P. et al. IMG/VR v4: an expanded database of uncultivated virus genomes inside a framework of intensive useful, taxonomic, and ecological metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D733–D743 (2023).
Google Scholar
Camargo, A. P. et al. IMG/PR: a database of plasmids from genomes and metagenomes with wealthy annotations and metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D164–D173 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ciciani, M. et al. Automated identification of sequence-tailored Cas9 proteins utilizing huge metagenomic knowledge. Nat. Commun. 13, 6474 (2022).
Google Scholar
Adler, B. A. et al. CasPEDIA Database: a useful classification system for sophistication 2 CRISPR–Cas enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D590–D596 (2024).
Google Scholar
Gleditzsch, D. et al. PAM identification by CRISPR–Cas effector complexes: diversified mechanisms and buildings. RNA Biol. 16, 504–517 (2019).
Google Scholar
Anders, C., Niewoehner, O., Duerst, A. & Jinek, M. Structural foundation of PAM-dependent goal DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nature 513, 569–573 (2014).
Google Scholar
Ruffolo, J. A. et al. Adapting protein language fashions for structure-conditioned design. Preprint at bioRxiv (2024).
Wei, J. et al. Carefully associated sort II-C Cas9 orthologs acknowledge numerous PAMs. eLife 11, e77825 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wimmer, F., Mougiakos, I., Englert, F. & Beisel, C. L. Fast cell-free characterization of multi-subunit CRISPR effectors and transposons. Mol. Cell 82, 1210–1224 (2022).
Google Scholar
Solar, W. et al. Buildings of Neisseria meningitidis Cas9 complexes in catalytically poised and anti-CRISPR-inhibited states. Mol. Cell 76, 938–952 (2019).
Google Scholar
Huang, X. et al. Decoding CRISPR-Cas PAM recognition with UniDesign. Transient. Bioinform. 24, bbad133 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hirano, S., Nishimasu, H., Ishitani, R. & Nureki, O. Structural foundation for the altered PAM specificities of engineered CRISPR–Cas9. Mol. Cell 61, 886–894 (2016).
Google Scholar
Anders, C., Bargsten, Ok. & Jinek, M. Structural plasticity of PAM recognition by engineered variants of the RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Mol. Cell 61, 895–902 (2016).
Google Scholar
Schmidheini, L. et al. Steady directed evolution of a compact CjCas9 variant with broad PAM compatibility. Nat. Chem. Biol. 20, 333–343 (2024).
Google Scholar
Amrani, N. et al. NmeCas9 is an intrinsically high-fidelity genome-editing platform. Genome Biol. 19, 1–25 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tsui, T. Ok. M., Hand, T. H., Duboy, E. C. & Li, H. The impression of DNA topology and information size on the right track choice by a cytosine-specific Cas9. ACS Synth. Biol. 6, 1103–1113 (2017).
Google Scholar
Luscombe, N. M., Laskowski, R. A. & Thornton, J. M. Amino acid-base interactions: a three-dimensional evaluation of protein–DNA interactions at an atomic stage. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 2860–2874 (2001).
Google Scholar
Walton, R. T., Hsu, J. Y., Joung, J. Ok. & Kleinstiver, B. P. Scalable characterization of the PAM necessities of CRISPR–Cas enzymes utilizing HT-PAMDA. Nat. Protoc. 16, 1511–1547 (2021).
Google Scholar
Grathwohl, W., Swersky, Ok., Hashemi, M., Duvenaud, D. & Maddison, C. Oops I took a gradient: scalable sampling for discrete distributions. In Proceedings of the thirty eighth Worldwide Convention on Machine Studying (eds Meila, M. & Zhang, T.) (PMLR, 2021).
Li, W. & Godzik, A. CD-HIT: a quick program for clustering and evaluating massive units of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22, 1658–1659 (2006).
Google Scholar
Buchfink, B., Xie, C. & Huson, D. H. Quick and delicate protein alignment utilizing DIAMOND. Nat. Strategies 12, 59–60 (2015).
Google Scholar
van Dongen, S. Graph clustering through a discrete uncoupling course of. SIAM J. Matrix. Anal. Appl. 30, 121–141 (2008).
Google Scholar
Deorowicz, S., Debudaj-Grabysz, A. & Gudyś, A. FAMSA: quick and correct a number of sequence alignment of big protein households. Sci. Rep. 6, 33964 (2016).
Google Scholar
Eddy, S. R. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002195 (2011).
Google Scholar
Steinegger, M. & Söding, J. MMseqs2 allows delicate protein sequence looking for the evaluation of huge knowledge units. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 1026–1028 (2017).
Google Scholar
Worth, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2—roughly maximum-likelihood bushes for big alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490 (2010).
Google Scholar
Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v5: a web-based instrument for phylogenetic tree show and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W293–W296 (2021).
Google Scholar
Liu, Z. et al. Versatile and environment friendly genome modifying with Neisseria cinerea Cas9. Commun. Biol. 5, 1–7 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hand, T. H., Das, A. & Li, H. Directed evolution research of a thermophilic sort II-C Cas9. Strategies Enzymol. 616, 265–288 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hirano, H. et al. Construction and engineering of Francisella novicida Cas9. Cell 164, 950–961 (2016).
Google Scholar
Cui, Z. et al. FrCas9 is a CRISPR/Cas9 system with excessive modifying effectivity and constancy. Nat. Commun. 13, 1425 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kim, E. et al. In vivo genome modifying with a small Cas9 orthologue derived from Campylobacter jejuni. Nat. Commun. 8, 14500 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hirano, S. et al. Structural foundation for the promiscuous PAM recognition by Corynebacterium diphtheriae Cas9. Nat. Commun. 10, 1968 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zetsche, B. et al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a category 2 CRISPR–Cas system. Cell 163, 759–771 (2015).
Google Scholar
Zetsche, B., Abudayyeh, O. O., Gootenberg, J. S., Scott, D. A. & Zhang, F. A survey of genome modifying exercise for 16 Cas12a orthologs. Keio J. Med. 69, 59–65 (2020).
Google Scholar
Strecker, J. et al. Engineering of CRISPR–Cas12b for human genome modifying. Nat. Commun. 10, 212 (2019).
Harrington, L. B. et al. A scoutRNA is required for some sort V CRISPR–Cas techniques. Mol. Cell 79, 416–424 (2020).
Google Scholar
Burstein, D. et al. New CRISPR–Cas techniques from uncultivated microbes. Nature 542, 237–241 (2017).
Google Scholar
Karvelis, T. et al. PAM recognition by miniature CRISPR–Cas12f nucleases triggers programmable double-stranded DNA goal cleavage. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 5016 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. A extremely particular CRISPR-Cas12j nuclease allows allele-specific genome modifying. Sci. Adv. 9, eabo6405 (2023).
Google Scholar
Strecker, J. et al. RNA-guided DNA insertion with CRISPR-associated transposases. Science 365, 48–53 (2019).
Google Scholar
Urbaitis, T. et al. A brand new household of CRISPR-type V nucleases with C-rich PAM recognition. EMBO Rep. 23, e55481 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wu, W. Y. et al. The miniature CRISPR–Cas12m effector binds DNA to dam transcription. Mol. Cell 82, 4487–4502 (2022).
Google Scholar
Al-Shayeb, B. et al. Various virus-encoded CRISPR–Cas techniques embrace streamlined genome editors. Cell 185, 4574–4586 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Catalytic-state construction and engineering of Streptococcus thermophilus Cas9. Nat. Catal. 3, 813–823 (2020).
Google Scholar
Tran, M. H. et al. A extra environment friendly CRISPR–Cas12a variant derived from MA2020. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 24, 40–53 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gao, L. et al. Engineered Cpf1 variants with altered PAM specificities. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 789–792 (2017).
Google Scholar
Russel, J., Pinilla-Redondo, R., Mayo-Mun˜oz, D., Shah, S. A. & Sørensen, S. J. CRISPRCasTyper: automated identification, annotation, and classification of CRISPR–Cas loci. CRISPR J. 3, 462–469 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chen, Z. & Zhao, H. A extremely delicate choice methodology for directed evolution of homing endonucleases. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, e154 (2005).
Google Scholar
Rohland, N. & Reich, D. Price-effective, high-throughput DNA sequencing libraries for multiplexed goal seize. Genome Res. 22, 939–946 (2012).
Google Scholar
Gooden, A. A., Evans, C. N., Sheets, T. P., Clapp, M. E. & Chari, R. dbGuide: a database of functionally validated information RNAs for genome modifying in human and mouse cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D871–D876 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890 (2018).
Google Scholar
Clement, Ok. et al. CRISPResso2 supplies correct and speedy genome modifying sequence evaluation. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 224–226 (2019).
Google Scholar
