In manufacturing, the place guide materials dealing with and different bodily demanding duties are frequent, wearable assistive applied sciences, reminiscent of exoskeletons, can alleviate the burden on employees. By providing biomechanical help and lowering fatigue, exoskeletons can play a task in selling occupational well being and ergonomics.
Utilizing exoskeletons for guide materials dealing with duties is especially helpful, since these duties are normally related to non-ergonomic postures that result in bodily discomfort and accidents.
Exoskeletons might be powered, passive or a hybrid of the 2. Powered exoskeletons are largely restricted to laboratory analysis, resulting from their larger prices and better complexity. In distinction, passive exoskeletons are rising in recognition, as a result of they’re extra reasonably priced and user-friendly.
The researchers used the Ottobock BackX, a passive back-support exoskeleton for industrial purposes. Photograph courtesy Santa Clara College
A passive exoskeleton depends on springs and pulleys as a substitute of motors to help with motion. Typically incorporating a belt or a buckle for attachment, such a exoskeleton is each gentle and user-friendly, which makes it handy to tackle and off and enhances mobility and luxury for the person. Apart from lowering bodily pressure, the exoskeleton may additionally lighten the cognitive load in duties requiring extended posture, probably bettering steadiness and psychological efficiency.
Regardless of their obvious advantages, adoption of exoskeletons stays restricted. Higher adoption has been hindered by an absence of readability on their results and dangers. Research point out that exoskeletons custom-made for particular person wants could also be more practical than generic fashions. Nevertheless, thorough evaluations, weighing their benefits and downsides, are nonetheless wanted to information builders, ergonomists and customers.
We got down to present an evaluation of customers’ interactions with a passive back-supporting exoskeleton. Our examine focuses on the benefits and difficulties encountered when customers put on a back-support exoskeleton throughout guide materials dealing with duties. As well as, the analysis gives a statistical comparability of the contributors’ bodily exertion and the biomechanical effort they understand whereas partaking in these duties.
Our Research
We designed a set of guide dealing with duties to be accomplished by contributors in two classes: one with using an exoskeleton, and one with out. Every participant was in good well being, with none bodily discomfort, medical situations or musculoskeletal issues.
In search of fast solutions on meeting and manufacturing matters?
Attempt Ask ASM, our new sensible AI search software.
Ask ASM
Our examine concerned 22 faculty college students—10 males and 12 ladies—who volunteered as contributors. Their common age was 20.5 years. Their common weight was 146 kilos.
Our examine examined the Ottobock BackX, a passive back-support exoskeleton for industrial purposes. The machine alleviates gravity-induced forces on the decrease again. It reduces exertion throughout duties involving stooping, lifting and reaching by offering supportive drive to person’s chest and thighs.
Initially, every participant carried out a sequence that included strolling for 2 minutes after which carrying and lifting a field weighing 15.6 kilos. These duties have been accomplished with out assistance from the exoskeleton. For the strolling job, contributors walked 8 ft, backwards and forwards, at their most popular strolling velocity. The carrying job concerned shifting the field between two factors 8 ft aside. Every job of carrying and lifting the field was repeated in two units of three repetitions. The peak at which the field was to be positioned throughout the lifting duties was mounted at 2 ft.
The duties have been then repeated whereas carrying the exoskeleton.
Breaks of three to 5 minutes have been offered all through the session to forestall fatigue and make sure the contributors’ well-being.
Research contributors have been requested to finish three duties: strolling, lifting a field, and carrying a field. Photograph courtesy Santa Clara College
Survey Parts and Evaluation
We used two varieties of evaluation: one for testing the influence of the exoskeleton on perceived bodily exertion and one other to look at interplay between customers and the exoskeleton.
To measure perceived bodily exertion, we used the Borg scale of 0 to 10, with “0” representing no exertion and “10” representing most exertion. The Borg scale is designed to fee muscle exertion and ache. Whereas subjective, it offers a transparent and direct measure of exertion.
The contributors rated their discomfort in varied physique elements, together with neck, shoulders, higher physique, chest, wrists, decrease physique, knees, ankles, ft and elbows.
As well as, the contributors accomplished a survey assessing a number of dimensions of the exoskeleton’s usability and influence. The survey included questions on ease of use, sensible utility, person attitudes, belief and total expertise. Every side was rated on a scale from 0 to 10.
For ease of use, the contributors rated cognitive effort, freedom of motion, bodily effort, and total ease of use. For usability, the contributors assessed posture enchancment, fatigue, perceived inefficiency, motion constraint and total helpfulness. To evaluate attitudes towards the product, the contributors rated the exoskeleton’s trustworthiness, ergonomic influence, basic sentiment, consolation and perceived innovation. Understanding these attitudes helps gauge person acceptance of the expertise.
Lastly, contributors have been requested to offer their scores on utilization chance, perceived energy augmentation, coaching necessities and influence on autonomy.
Individuals reported much less perceived bodily exertion whereas carrying an exoskeleton than they did with out it. Photograph courtesy Santa Clara College
Exertion Outcomes
Our information point out a big discount in perceived bodily exertion when the duties have been carried out with the exoskeleton. This highlights the potential of exoskeletons as an ergonomic software in high-exertion settings reminiscent of manufacturing.
The exoskeleton decreased the perceived bodily exertion for a number of physique elements. For the decrease again, the discount was substantial, with a lower of twenty-two.67 factors, indicating a serious alleviation of exertion. The knee confirmed a notable discount of 9.33 factors, and the shoulder a big drop of 10 factors. The higher again skilled a discount of 9 factors, whereas the ankle and wrist confirmed decreases of 6.66 and 5.33 factors, respectively. The ft and elbow additionally benefited from the exoskeleton, with reductions of 4 and three.67 factors, respectively.
In distinction, the chest skilled a slight improve in exertion with the exoskeleton, with an increase of three factors, suggesting that the exoskeleton would possibly add some load to this space. The neck confirmed a minimal discount in PPE, with a lower of only one.34 factors.
Total, the exoskeleton seemed to be efficient in lowering bodily exertion in most physique elements, significantly within the decrease again, knees and shoulders.
The exoskeleton was significantly helpful in relieving perceived bodily exertion of the decrease again. Photograph courtesy Santa Clara College
Not surprisingly, the extent of bodily exertion assorted by job. Strolling was much less demanding than lifting and carrying the field. The numerous variations throughout duties recommend that exoskeletons might present various levels of help relying on the precise actions carried out.
For the strolling job, the imply distinction within the exertion scores with the exoskeleton and with out it was 3.8, indicating no statistically important distinction. Nevertheless, for the lifting job, the check confirmed a big imply distinction of 8.15 in exertion scores, confirming that the exoskeleton reduces bodily exertion in lifting. For the carrying job, the imply distinction in exertion scores was 6.55, suggesting no statistically important distinction.
These outcomes spotlight the effectiveness of the exoskeleton in lowering bodily exertion throughout lifting duties, whereas its influence on strolling and carrying duties is much less pronounced.
The exoskeleton decreased exertion throughout lifting duties, whereas its influence on strolling and carrying duties was much less pronounced. Photograph courtesy Santa Clara College
Survey Outcomes
Our survey concerning the exoskeleton yielded blended outcomes.
The exoskeleton acquired excessive scores for security, belief and ergonomic help. Nevertheless, it acquired average scores in empowerment and willingness to reuse. Addressing the sentiments of constraint and intimidation would improve person expertise and acceptance of the machine.
The exoskeleton acquired excessive common scores for helpfulness, ease of use, security, belief and posture enchancment. Customers typically discovered that the exoskeleton was helpful in enhancing their posture, was simple to function, and instilled a way of security and reliability.
Then again, the exoskeleton acquired low common scores for perceived tiredness, perceived time wasted, perceived constraint, cognitive effort, degree of freeness, and perceived bodily effort.
Reasonable scores for perceived constraint and bodily effort level to some discomfort and bodily exertion and restricted motion whereas carrying the machine. Moreover, the middling rating for freeness means that the customers skilled a level of motion limitation, which might have an effect on job efficiency and total satisfaction.
The contributors additionally rated cognitive effort, motion freedom, bodily effort, and total ease of use. The cognitive effort required to make use of the exoskeleton was rated at 2.42 out of 10, suggesting that the psychological demand of working the machine is comparatively low. Motion freedom, or freeness, scored 5.09 out of 10, indicating a average degree of autonomy in motion whereas utilizing the exoskeleton. The bodily effort required to function the exoskeleton was rated 3.27 out of 10, reflecting that the bodily exertion wanted was manageable, however could possibly be improved.
Total, the exoskeleton’s ease of use was rated 6.32 out of 10, suggesting that whereas the machine is usually user-friendly, there are alternatives to additional scale back the cognitive and bodily effort required to make use of it successfully.
Usability was assessed by means of a number of dimensions, together with posture enchancment, fatigue degree, perceived inefficiency, motion constraint, and total helpfulness. The exoskeleton acquired a posture enchancment ranking of 5.55 out of 10, highlighting its effectiveness in enhancing bodily alignment. The contributors reported a fatigue degree of two.64 out of 10, indicating that the exoskeleton helped to considerably scale back fatigue.
Perceived inefficiency, or time wasted, was rated very low at 1.86 out of 10, suggesting that the exoskeleton didn’t hinder productiveness. Nevertheless, motion constraint acquired a rating of three.09 out of 10, indicating that some customers felt restricted of their actions whereas utilizing the machine. Total, the helpfulness of the exoskeleton was rated 5.41 out of 10, reflecting a optimistic influence on job effectivity, but additionally highlighting areas for enchancment in lowering motion constraints.
The contributors offered scores on varied elements of their attitudes in the direction of the exoskeleton, together with trustworthiness, ergonomic influence, basic sentiment, consolation, and perceived innovation. Trustworthiness acquired a excessive ranking of 6.59 out of 10, displaying that the customers felt assured concerning the machine’s reliability and performance. The ergonomic influence was rated 6.0 out of 10, indicating that the exoskeleton offered important help in lowering bodily pressure. Basic sentiment, or how a lot the contributors preferred the exoskeleton, was rated 6.23 out of 10, reflecting a typically optimistic perspective in the direction of the machine. Consolation acquired a rating of 5.86 out of 10, suggesting that whereas the exoskeleton is comparatively snug, there’s room for enhancement. Perceived innovation was rated 5.09 out of 10, indicating a average recognition of the exoskeleton’s technological development.
Lastly, the contributors have been requested to offer their scores on utilization chance, perceived energy augmentation, coaching necessities, and influence on autonomy. Utilization chance, or the intention to reuse the exoskeleton, was rated 4.44 out of 10, suggesting that whereas the general expertise was optimistic, there’s room for enchancment. Perceived empowerment acquired a ranking of 4.82 out of 10, indicating that the exoskeleton reasonably enhanced the person’s sense of energy and functionality.
The coaching necessities have been rated very low at 2.41 out of 10, reflecting that minimal coaching was wanted to make use of the exoskeleton successfully. Affect on autonomy was additionally rated low at 2.45 out of 10, suggesting that the exoskeleton didn’t hinder the person’s sense of management and independence.
Our outcomes recommend that whereas the exoskeleton had a optimistic influence on lowering bodily exertion and supporting safer lifting practices, additional refinement in its design might enhance flexibility, consolation and broader utility.
The exoskeleton decreased discomfort and bodily exertion in essential areas such because the again, shoulders, and knees. Photograph courtesy Ottobock
Conclusions
Our findings present that the exoskeleton decreased discomfort and bodily exertion in essential areas such because the again, shoulders and knees, that are susceptible to damage in industrial environments. By enhancing ergonomic postures, the exoskeleton alleviates rapid bodily pressure and contributes to the long-term prevention of musculoskeletal issues.
Regardless of these optimistic outcomes, the survey additionally highlighted areas for enchancment, significantly in lowering emotions of constraint and bettering total consolation.
Our examine was restricted by its pattern measurement and demographic. Younger, wholesome faculty college students might not totally characterize the varied workforce in manufacturing. Future analysis ought to purpose to incorporate a bigger and extra various pattern to boost the robustness and applicability of the findings.
Moreover, the examine relied solely on subjective survey strategies and didn’t use biophysical measures, reminiscent of electromyography. Moreover, the laboratory atmosphere doesn’t fully mimic the complexities and variations of real-world manufacturing. These elements spotlight the significance of conducting additional analysis involving real-world settings.
It’s essential to additionally discover the long-term results of exoskeleton use on employee well being and productiveness, together with potential destructive outcomes, reminiscent of dependency or over-reliance on the expertise.
Since a number of passive exoskeletons can be found available on the market, and just one kind was examined on this trial, future research ought to take into account testing a variety of exoskeletons to find out the most effective matches for varied duties and customers.
The deployment of passive exoskeletons in manufacturing might result in enhancements in employee security, consolation and productiveness. Nevertheless, to totally understand these advantages, ongoing refinement of the design and personalised coaching packages shall be important.
Editor’s be aware: This text is a abstract of a analysis paper co-authored by Armin Moghadam, Ph.D., assistant professor of engineering at San Jose State College; and Arnold Nieto and Hardik Vora, analysis assistants at Santa Clara College. To learn your complete paper, click on right here.
For extra data on exoskeletons, learn these articles:
Exoskeletons Lend a Elevate at Ford
Exoskeletons Help Assemblers at Truck Plant
Exosuits Ease Again Pressure
