Nguyen, T. T. et al. Deep studying for deepfakes creation and detection: a survey. Comp. Vis. Picture Underst. 223, 103525 (2022).
Google Scholar
Fallis, D. The epistemic risk of deepfakes. Philos. Technol. 34, 623–643 (2021).
Google Scholar
Raghunathan, T. E. Artificial information. Annu. Rev. Stat. Appl. 8, 129–140 (2021).
Google Scholar
Figueira, A. & Vaz, B. Survey on artificial information era, analysis strategies and GANs. Arithmetic 10, 2733 (2022).
Google Scholar
de MeloA, C. M. et al. Subsequent-generation deep studying primarily based on simulators and artificial information. Developments Cognit. Sci. 26, 174–187 (2022).
Google Scholar
Laubenbacher, R., Mehrad, B., Shmulevich, I. & Trayanova, N. Digital twins in medication. Nat. Comput. Sci. 4, 184–191 (2024).
Google Scholar
Rubin, D. B. A number of Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys (John Wiley & Sons, 2004).
Goodfellow, I. J. et al. Generative adversarial community. Preprint at (2014). This examine introduces the idea of GANs, upon which all additional iterations of GAN-based generative fashions are primarily based.
Kingma, D. P. & Welling, M. Auto-encoding variational Bayes. Preprint at (2022). This examine introduces VAEs, a key expertise in artificial information era.
Ho, J., Jain, A. & Abbeel, P. in Advances in Neural Data Processing Methods Vol. 33 6840–6851 (Curran Associates, 2020). This examine launched denoising diffusion probabilistic fashions, a generative mannequin primarily based on iterative noise removing that laid the muse for the widespread adoption of diffusion fashions for imaging.
Nichol, A. Q. & Dhariwal, P. Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic fashions. In Proc. thirty eighth Worldwide Convention on Machine Studying 8162–8171 (PMLR, 2021).
Saharia, C. et al. Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion fashions with deep language understanding. Adv. Neural Inf. Course of. Syst. 35, 36479–36494 (2022).
Khader, F. et al. Denoising diffusion probabilistic fashions for 3D medical picture era. Sci. Rep. 13, 7303 (2023).
Google Scholar
Pozzi, M. et al. Producing and evaluating artificial information in digital pathology by way of diffusion fashions. Sci. Rep. 14, 28435 (2024).
Google Scholar
Vaswani, A. et al. Consideration is all you want. Preprint at (2017). This examine launched transformer structure, a self-attention-based deep-learning framework that has develop into the muse of state-of-the-art massive language fashions.
Clusmann, J. et al. The long run panorama of enormous language fashions in medication. Commun. Med. 3, 1–8 (2023).
Google Scholar
Truhn, D., Reis-Filho, J. S. & Kather, J. N. Massive language fashions needs to be used as scientific reasoning engines, not data databases. Nat. Med. 29, 2983–2984 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kather, J. N., Ghaffari Laleh, N., Foersch, S. & Truhn, D. Medical area data in domain-agnostic generative AI. npj Digit. Med. 5, 90 (2022).
Google Scholar
Smolyak, D., Bjarnadóttir, M. V., Crowley, Ok. & Agarwal, R. Massive language fashions and artificial well being information: progress and prospects. JAMIA Open 7, ooae114 (2024).
Google Scholar
Vallevik, V. B. et al. Can I belief my faux information — a complete high quality evaluation framework for artificial tabular information in healthcare. Int. J. Med. Inform. 185, 105413 (2024). This examine supplies a complete analysis framework for high quality evaluation of artificial tabular healthcare information.
Google Scholar
Tucker, A., Wang, Z., Rotalinti, Y. & Myles, P. Producing high-fidelity artificial affected person information for assessing machine studying healthcare software program. npj Digit. Med. 3, 1–13 (2020).
Google Scholar
Alaa, A. M., van Breugel, B., Saveliev, E. & van der Schaar, M. How devoted is your artificial information? Pattern-level metrics for evaluating and auditing generative fashions. In Proc. thirty ninth Worldwide Convention on Machine Studying 290–306 (PMLR, 2022).
Hittmeir, M., Ekelhart, A. & Mayer, R. On the utility of artificial information: an empirical analysis on machine studying duties. In Proc. 14th Worldwide Convention on Availability, Reliability and Safety 1–6 (Affiliation for Computing Equipment, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1145/3339252.3339281.
El Emam, Ok. Seven methods to guage the utility of artificial information. IEEE Safety Priv. 18, 56–59 (2020). This examine supplies a framework for evaluating the usability of artificial information utilizing examine replication, structural similarity, area experience and metrics.
Google Scholar
Yale, A. et al. Era and analysis of privateness preserving artificial well being information. Neurocomputing 416, 244–255 (2020).
Google Scholar
Moore, J. & Guichot, Y. D. Easy methods to harness the ability of well being information to enhance affected person outcomes. World Financial Discussion board (5 January 2024).
US Division of Well being and Human Providers. Well being data privateness. (2021).
European Union. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the safety of pure individuals with regard to the processing of non-public information and on the free motion of such information, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (Normal Information Safety Regulation) (textual content with EEA relevance). EUR-Lex (2016).
Emam, Ok. E., Jonker, E., Arbuckle, L. & Malin, B. A scientific evaluate of re-identification assaults on well being information. PLoS ONE 6, e28071 (2011). This evaluate systematically evaluates research on re-identification assaults for healthcare, which reach 34% of instances, highlighting an pressing want for privateness preservation methods.
Google Scholar
Ferguson, A. R., Nielson, J. L., Cragin, M. H., Bandrowski, A. E. & Martone, M. E. Large information from small information: data-sharing within the ‘long tail’ of neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1442–1447 (2014).
Google Scholar
Li, L., Fan, Y., Tse, M. & Lin, Ok.-Y. A evaluate of functions in federated studying. Computer systems Ind. Eng. 149, 106854 (2020).
Google Scholar
Warnat-Herresthal, S. et al. Swarm studying for decentralized and confidential medical machine studying. Nature 594, 265–270 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lyu, L. et al. Privateness and robustness in federated studying: assaults and defenses. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Study. Syst. 35, 8726–8746 (2024).
Google Scholar
Graves, J. L., Kearney, M., Barabino, G. & Malcom, S. Inequality in science and the case for a brand new agenda. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2117831119 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ejermo, O. & Sofer, Y. When faculties graduate: micro-level results on publications and scientific group. Res. Coverage 53, 105007 (2024).
Google Scholar
Eckardt, J.-N. et al. Artificial bone marrow photographs increase actual samples in growing acute myeloid leukemia microscopy classification fashions. npj Digit. Med. 8, 173 (2025).
Google Scholar
Levine, A. B. et al. Synthesis of diagnostic high quality most cancers pathology photographs by generative adversarial networks. J. Pathol. 252, 178–188 (2020).
Google Scholar
Deshpande, S., Dawood, M., Minhas, F. & Rajpoot, N. SynCLay: interactive synthesis of histology photographs from bespoke mobile layouts. Med. Picture Anal. 91, 102995 (2024).
Google Scholar
Müller-Franzes, G. et al. A multimodal comparability of latent denoising diffusion probabilistic fashions and generative adversarial networks for medical picture synthesis. Sci. Rep. 13, 12098 (2023).
Google Scholar
Osorio, P. et al. Latent diffusion fashions with image-derived annotations for enhanced AI-assisted most cancers prognosis in histopathology. Diagnostics 14, 1442 (2024).
Google Scholar
Niehues, J. M. et al. Utilizing histopathology latent diffusion fashions as privacy-preserving dataset augmenters improves downstream classification efficiency. Computer systems Biol. Med. 175, 108410 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kather, J. N. et al. Deep studying can predict microsatellite instability straight from histology in gastrointestinal most cancers. Nat. Med. 25, 1054–1056 (2019).
Google Scholar
Krause, J. et al. Deep studying detects genetic alterations in most cancers histology generated by adversarial networks. J. Pathol. 254, 70–79 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dolezal, J. M. et al. Deep studying generates artificial most cancers histology for explainability and schooling. npj Summary. Oncol. 7, 49 (2023).
Google Scholar
Howard, F. M. et al. Generative adversarial networks precisely reconstruct pan-cancer histology from pathologic, genomic, and radiographic latent options. Sci. Adv. 10, eadq0856 (2024).
Google Scholar
Carrillo-Perez, F. et al. Artificial whole-slide picture tile era with gene expression profile-infused deep generative fashions. Cell Rep. Strategies 3, 100534 (2023).
Google Scholar
Carrillo-Perez, F. et al. Era of artificial whole-slide picture tiles of tumours from RNA-sequencing information by way of cascaded diffusion fashions. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 9, 320–332 (2025).
Google Scholar
Bai, B. et al. Deep learning-enabled digital histological staining of organic samples. Gentle Sci. Appl. 12, 57 (2023).
Google Scholar
Pati, P. et al. Accelerating histopathology workflows with generative AI-based just about multiplexed tumour profiling. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 1077–1093 (2024).
Google Scholar
Koetzier, L. R. et al. Producing artificial information for medical imaging. Radiology 312, e232471 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sizikova, E. et al. Artificial information in radiological imaging: present state and future outlook. BJR Artif. Intell. 1, ubae007 (2024).
Jung, H. Ok., Kim, Ok., Park, J. E. & Kim, N. Picture-based generative synthetic intelligence in radiology: complete updates. Korean J. Radiol. 25, 959–981 (2024).
Google Scholar
D’Amico, S. et al. Artificial information era by synthetic intelligence to speed up analysis and precision medication in hematology. JCO Clin. Most cancers Inf. 7, e2300021 (2023).
Bernard, E. et al. Molecular worldwide prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. NEJM Evid. 1, EVIDoa2200008 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kang, H. Y. J. et al. Artificial tabular information primarily based on generative adversarial networks in well being care: era and validation utilizing the divide-and-conquer technique. JMIR Med. Inform. 11, e47859 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ganguli, R., Lad, R., Lin, A. & Yu, X. Novel generative recurrent neural community framework to provide correct, relevant, and deidentified artificial medical information for sufferers with metastatic most cancers. JCO Clin. Most cancers Inf. 7, e2200125 (2023).
Díaz-Navarro, A., Zhang, X., Jiao, W., Wang, B. & Stein, L. In silico era of artificial most cancers genomes utilizing generative AI. Cell Genom. 5, 100969 (2025).
Google Scholar
Kim, J. & Seok, J. ctGAN: mixed transformation of gene expression and survival information with generative adversarial community. Transient. Bioinform. 25, bbae325 (2024).
Google Scholar
Norcliffe, A., Cebere, B., Imrie, F., Lio, P. & van der Schaar, M. SurvivalGAN: producing time-to-event information for survival evaluation. Preprint at (2023).
Hogenboom, J. et al. Actionability of artificial information in a heterogeneous and uncommon well being care demographic: adolescents and younger adults with most cancers. JCO Clin. Most cancers Inf. 8, e2400056 (2024).
Vlooswijk, C. et al. Recruiting adolescent and younger grownup most cancers survivors for patient-reported final result analysis: experiences and pattern traits of the SURVAYA examine. Curr. Oncol. 29, 5407–5425 (2022).
Google Scholar
Juwara, L., El-Hussuna, A. & El Emam, Ok. An analysis of artificial information augmentation for mitigating covariate bias in well being information. Patterns 5, 100946 (2024).
Google Scholar
Walonoski, J. et al. Synthea: an method, methodology, and software program mechanism for producing artificial sufferers and the artificial digital well being care report. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 25, 230–238 (2018).
Google Scholar
Nationwide Illness Registration Service. The Simulacrum. NDRS (accessed 28 September 2025).
Netherlands Complete Most cancers Organisation. Artificial dataset. IKNL (accessed 28 September 2025).
Wouters, O. J., McKee, M. & Luyten, J. Estimated analysis and improvement funding wanted to carry a brand new medication to market, 2009–2018. JAMA 323, 844–853 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mulcahy, A. et al. Use of medical trial traits to estimate prices of latest drug improvement. JAMA Netw. Open 8, e2453275 (2025).
Google Scholar
Sertkaya, A., Beleche, T., Jessup, A. & Sommers, B. D. Prices of drug improvement and analysis and improvement depth within the US, 2000–2018. JAMA Netw. Open 7, e2415445 (2024).
Google Scholar
Solar, D., Gao, W., Hu, H. & Zhou, S. Why 90% of medical drug improvement fails and find out how to enhance it? Acta Pharm. Sin. B 12, 3049–3062 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mullard, A. The excessive, and redundant, value of failure in most cancers drug improvement. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 22, 688–688 (2023).
Google Scholar
Briel, M. et al. A scientific evaluate of discontinued trials recommended that almost all causes for recruitment failure have been preventable. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 80, 8–15 (2016).
Google Scholar
Briel, M. et al. Exploring causes for recruitment failure in medical trials: a qualitative examine with medical trial stakeholders in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada. Trials 22, 844 (2021).
Google Scholar
Van Norman, G. A. Medicine and units: comparability of European and U.S. approval processes. JACC Primary Transl. Sci. 1, 399–412 (2016).
Google Scholar
Brown, D. G., Wobst, H. J., Kapoor, A., Kenna, L. A. & Southall, N. T. Scientific improvement occasions for progressive medicine. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 21, 793–794 (2022).
Google Scholar
Stewart, D. J. et al. The significance of better pace in drug improvement for superior malignancies. Most cancers Med. 7, 1824–1836 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sengupta, S. et al. Emulating randomized managed trials with hybrid management arms in oncology: a case examine. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 113, 867–877 (2023).
Google Scholar
Tan, W. Ok. et al. Augmenting management arms with real-world information for most cancers trials: hybrid management arm strategies and issues. Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 30, 101000 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ventz, S. et al. The design and analysis of hybrid managed trials that leverage exterior information and randomization. Nat. Commun. 13, 5783 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ghadessi, M. et al. A roadmap to utilizing historic controls in medical trials — by Drug Data Affiliation Adaptive Design Scientific Working Group (DIA-ADSWG). Orphanet J. Uncommon Dis. 15, 69 (2020).
Google Scholar
Corridor, Ok. T. et al. Historic controls in randomized medical trials: alternatives and challenges. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 109, 343–351 (2021).
Google Scholar
Marion, J. D. & Althouse, A. D. Using historic controls in medical trials. JAMA 330, 1484–1485 (2023).
Google Scholar
Fountzilas, E., Tsimberidou, A. M., Vo, H. H. & Kurzrock, R. Scientific trial design within the period of precision medication. Genome Med. 14, 101 (2022).
Google Scholar
Duan, X.-P. et al. New medical trial design in precision medication: discovery, improvement and route. Sign Transduct. Goal. Ther. 9, 1–29 (2024).
Lee, H. Y., Ha, H., Kang, J. H. & Park, H.-S. Precision oncology medical trials: a scientific evaluate of part II medical trials with biomarker-driven, adaptive design. JCO 42, e23005 (2024).
Google Scholar
Gatta, G. et al. Uncommon cancers should not so uncommon: the uncommon most cancers burden in Europe. Eur. J. Most cancers 47, 2493–2511 (2011).
Google Scholar
Matsuda, T. et al. Uncommon cancers should not uncommon in Asia as properly: the uncommon most cancers burden in East Asia. Most cancers Epidemiol. 67, 101702 (2020).
Google Scholar
Eckardt, J.-N. et al. Mimicking medical trials with artificial acute myeloid leukemia sufferers utilizing generative synthetic intelligence. npj Digit. Med. 7, 1–11 (2024).
Google Scholar
Piciocchi, A. et al. Unlocking the potential of artificial sufferers for accelerating medical trials: outcomes of the primary GIMEMA expertise on acute myeloid leukemia sufferers. eJHaem 5, 353–359 (2024).
Google Scholar
Nowok, B., Raab, G. M. & Dibben, C. synthpop: bespoke creation of artificial information in R. J. Stat. Softw. 74, 1–26 (2016).
Google Scholar
Venditti, A. et al. GIMEMA AML1310 trial of risk-adapted, MRD-directed remedy for younger adults with newly recognized acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 134, 935–945 (2019).
Google Scholar
Azizi, Z., Zheng, C., Mosquera, L., Pilote, L. & Emam, Ok. E. Can artificial information be a proxy for actual medical trial information? A validation examine. BMJ Open 11, e043497 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dahdaleh, F. S. et al. Obstruction predicts worse long-term outcomes in stage III colon most cancers: a secondary evaluation of the N0147 trial. Surgical procedure 164, 1223–1229 (2018).
Google Scholar
Elvatun, S., Knoors, D., Brant, S., Jonasson, C. & Nygård, J. F. Artificial information as exterior management arms in scarce single-arm medical trials. PLoS Digital Well being 4, e0000581 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Cormode, G., Procopiuc, C. M., Srivastava, D. & Xiao, X. PrivBayes: personal information launch by way of Bayesian networks. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 42, 25:1–25:41 (2017).
Google Scholar
Xu, L., Skoularidou, M., Cuesta-Infante, A. & Veeramachaneni, Ok. Modeling tabular information utilizing conditional GAN. In Advances in Neural Data Processing Methods Vol. 32 (Curran Associates, 2019).
Akiya, I., Ishihara, T. & Yamamoto, Ok. Comparability of artificial information era methods for management group survival information in oncology medical trials: simulation examine. JMIR Med. Inf. 12, e55118 (2024).
Google Scholar
El-Kababji, S. et al. Augmenting insufficiently accruing oncology medical trials utilizing generative fashions: validation examine. J. Med. Web Res. 27, e66821 (2025).
Google Scholar
Beigi, M., Shafquat, A., Mezey, J. & Aptekar, J. Simulants: artificial medical trial information by way of subject-level privacy-preserving synthesis. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2022, 231–240 (2023).
Google Scholar
Giuffrè, M. & Shung, D. L. Harnessing the ability of artificial information in healthcare: innovation, software, and privateness. npj Digit. Med. 6, 1–8 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, R. J., Lu, M. Y., Chen, T. Y., Williamson, D. F. Ok. & Mahmood, F. Artificial information in machine studying for medication and healthcare. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 493–497 (2021).
Google Scholar
Draghi, B., Wang, Z., Myles, P. & Tucker, A. BayesBoost: figuring out and dealing with bias utilizing artificial information turbines. In Proceedings of the Third Worldwide Workshop on Studying with Imbalanced Domains: Idea and Purposes 49–62 (PMLR, 2021).
Shahul Hameed, M. A., Qureshi, A. M. & Kaushik, A. Bias mitigation by way of artificial information era: a evaluate. Electronics 13, 3909 (2024).
Google Scholar
Baumann, J., Castelnovo, A., Crupi, R., Inverardi, N. & Regoli, D. Bias on demand: a modelling framework that generates artificial information with bias. In Proc. 2023 ACM Convention on Equity, Accountability, and Transparency 1002–1013 (Affiliation for Computing Equipment, 2023); https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594058.
Ge, L., Li, H., Wang, X. & Wang, Z. A evaluate of safe federated studying: privateness leakage threats, safety applied sciences, challenges and future instructions. Neurocomputing 561, 126897 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hu, H. et al. Membership inference assaults on machine studying: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 54, 235:1–235:37 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yang, W. et al. Deep studying mannequin inversion assaults and defenses: a complete survey. Artif. Intell. Rev. 58, 242 (2025).
Google Scholar
Farah, E., Kenney, M., Warkentin, M. T., Cheung, W. Y. & Brenner, D. R. Analyzing exterior management arms in oncology: a scoping evaluate of functions thus far. Most cancers Med. 13, e7447 (2024).
Google Scholar
Serrano, C. et al. Rethinking placebos: embracing artificial management arms in medical trials for uncommon tumors. Nat. Med. 29, 2689–2692 (2023).
Google Scholar
Davies, J. et al. Comparative effectiveness from a single-arm trial and real-world information: alectinib versus ceritinib. J. Comp. Efficient. Res. 7, 855–865 (2018).
Google Scholar
Jaksa, A. et al. A comparability of seven oncology exterior management arm case research: critiques from regulatory and well being expertise evaluation companies. Worth Well being 25, 1967–1976 (2022).
Google Scholar
Arondekar, B. et al. Actual-world proof in help of oncology product registration: a scientific evaluate of latest drug software and biologics license software approvals from 2015–2020. Clin. Most cancers Res. 28, 27–35 (2022).
Google Scholar
Meals and Drug Administration. Good Machine Studying Follow for Medical Machine Improvement: Guiding Rules. FDA (2025). The FDA lately launched Good Machine Studying Practices to information the event, analysis and implementation of medical software program for medical use primarily based on machine studying.
Hernandez, M. et al. Complete analysis framework for artificial tabular information in well being: constancy, utility and privateness evaluation of generative fashions with and with out privateness ensures. Entrance. Digit. Well being 7, 1576290 (2025).
Google Scholar
Shahbazian, R. & Greco, S. Generative adversarial networks help lacking information imputation: a complete survey and analysis. IEEE Entry 11, 88908–88928 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jarrett, D., Cebere, B. C., Liu, T., Curth, A. & van der Schaar, M. HyperImpute: generalized iterative imputation with automated mannequin choice. In Proc. thirty ninth Worldwide Convention on Machine Studying 9916–9937 (PMLR, 2022).
Vero, M., Balunovic, M. & Vechev, M. CuTS: customizable tabular artificial information era. In Proc. forty first Worldwide Convention on Machine Studying 49408–49433 (PMLR, 2024).
Breugel, B. V., Qian, Z. & Schaar, M. V. D. Artificial information, actual errors: how (not) to publish and use artificial information. In Proc. fortieth Worldwide Convention on Machine Studying 34793–34808 (PMLR, 2023).
Probst, P., Boulesteix, A.-L. & Bischl, B. Tunability: significance of hyperparameters of machine studying algorithms. J. Mach. Study. Res. 20, 1–32 (2019).
Wang, H., Sudalairaj, S., Henning, J., Greenewald, Ok. & Srivastava, A. Submit-processing personal artificial information for enhancing utility on chosen measures. Adv. Neural Inf. Course of. Syst. 36, 64139–64154 (2023).
Pilgram, L. et al. A consensus privateness metrics framework for artificial information. Patterns (2025).
Google Scholar
Dwork, C. in Automata, Languages and Programming (eds Bugliesi, M. et al.) 1–12 (Springer, 2006); This examine introduces the idea of differential privateness, demonstrating that including noise to artificial well being information might mitigate re-identification makes an attempt.
Boulemtafes, A., Derhab, A. & Challal, Y. A evaluate of privacy-preserving methods for deep studying. Neurocomputing 384, 21–45 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gibney, E. May machine studying gasoline a reproducibility disaster in science? Nature 608, 250–251 (2022).
Google Scholar
