With one in three cyber-attacks now involving compromised worker accounts, insurers and regulators are inserting far larger emphasis on id posture when assessing cyber danger.
For a lot of organizations, nonetheless, these assessments stay largely opaque. Components akin to password hygiene, privileged entry administration, and the extent of multi-factor authentication (MFA) protection are more and more influential in how cyber danger and insurance coverage prices are evaluated.
Understanding the identity-centric elements behind these assessments is crucial for organizations looking for to display decrease danger publicity and safe extra favorable insurance coverage phrases.
Why id posture now drives underwriting
With the worldwide common price of an information breach reaching $4.4 million in 2025, extra organizations are turning to cyber insurance coverage to handle monetary publicity. Within the UK, protection has elevated from 37% in 2023 to 45% in 2025, however rising claims volumes are prompting insurers to tighten underwriting necessities.
Credential compromise stays one of the vital dependable methods for attackers to achieve entry, escalate privileges, and persist inside an surroundings. For insurers, sturdy id controls cut back the probability {that a} single compromised account can result in widespread disruption or information loss, supporting extra sustainable underwriting selections.
What insurers wish to see in id safety
Password hygiene and credential publicity
Regardless of the rising use of multi-factor authentication and passwordless initiatives, passwords still play a key role in authentication. Organizations should pay particular attention to the behaviors and issues that increase the risk of credential theft and abuse, including:
- Password reuse across identities, particularly among administrative or service accounts, increases the likelihood that one stolen credential leads to broader access.
- Legacy authentication protocols are still common in networks and frequently abused to harvest credentials. NTLM persists in many environments despite being functionally replaced by Kerberos in Windows 2000.
- Dormant accounts with valid credentials, which act as unmonitored entry points and often retain unnecessary access.
- Service accounts with never-expiring passwords, creating long-lived, low-visibility attack paths.
- Shared administrative credentials, reduce accountability and amplify the impact of compromise.
From an underwriting perspective, evidence that an organization understands and actively manages these risks is often more important than the presence of individual technical controls. Regular audits of password hygiene and credential exposure help demonstrate maturity and intent to reduce identity-driven risk.
Privileged access management
Privileged access management is a critical measure of an organization’s ability to prevent and mitigate breaches. Privileged accounts can have high-level access to systems and data, but are frequently over-permissioned. As a result, insurers pay close attention to how these accounts are governed.
Service accounts, cloud administrators, and delegated privileges outside central monitoring significantly elevate risk. This is especially true when they operate without MFA or logging.
Excessive membership in Domain Admin or Global Administrator roles and overlapping administrative scopes all suggest that privilege escalation would be both rapid and difficult to contain.
Poorly governed or unknown privileged access is typically viewed as higher risk than a small number of tightly controlled administrators. Security teams can use tools such as Specops Password Auditor to identify stale, inactive, or over-privileged administrative accounts and prioritize remediation before those credentials are abused.
 |
| Specops Password Auditor – Dashboard |
When determining the likelihood of a damaging breach, the question is straightforward: if an attacker compromises a single account, how quickly can they become an administrator? Where the answer is “immediately” or “with minimal effort,” premiums tend to reflect that exposure.
MFA coverage
Most organizations can credibly state that MFA has been deployed. However, MFA only meaningfully reduces risk when it is consistently enforced across all critical systems and accounts. In one documented case, the City of Hamilton was denied an $18 million cyber insurance payout after a ransomware attack because MFA had not been fully implemented across affected systems.
While MFA isn’t infallible, fatigue attacks first require valid account credentials and then depend on a user approving an unfamiliar authentication request, an outcome that is far from guaranteed.
Meanwhile, accounts that authenticate via older protocols, non-interactive service accounts, or privileged roles exempted for convenience all offer viable bypass paths once initial access is achieved.
That’s why insurers increasingly require MFA for all privileged accounts, as well as for email and remote access. Organizations that neglect it may face higher premiums.
Four steps to improve your identity cyber score
There are many ways organizations can improve identity security, but insurers look for evidence of progress in a few key areas:
- Eliminate weak and shared passwords: Enforce minimum password standards and reduce password reuse, particularly for administrative and service accounts. Strong password hygiene limits the impact of credential theft and reduces the risk of lateral movement following initial access.
- Apply MFA across all critical access paths: Ensure MFA is enforced on remote access, cloud applications, VPNs, and all privileged accounts. Insurers increasingly expect MFA coverage to be comprehensive rather than selectively applied.
- Reduce permanent privileged access: Limit permanent administrative rights wherever practical and adopt just-in-time or time-bound access for elevated tasks. Fewer always-on privileged accounts directly reduce the impact of credential compromise.
- Regularly review and certify access: Conduct routine reviews of user and privileged permissions to ensure they align with current roles. Stale access and orphaned accounts are common red flags in insurance assessments.
Insurers increasingly expect organizations to demonstrate not only that identity controls exist, but that they are actively monitored and improved over time.
Specops Password Auditor supports this by providing clear visibility into password exposure within Active Directory and enforcing controls that reduce credential-based risk.
To understand how these controls can be applied in your environment and aligned with insurer expectations, speak with a Specops expert or request a live demo.
